Since it seems that Joshua will be delaying our discussion of The Village, I felt that I needed to fill this space with something. I struggled to find anything meaningful to share, so I decided to tackle an issue that has arisen of late.
Why do I always refer to Josh as Joshua?
This is a disturbing trend that I have noticed lately. In fact, I dare say that may be the last time you ever hear me utter the word "Josh" (except for the fact that I didn't utter it and you didn't hear it).
From the time that I wrote my first post, entitled Why Try Avoidance?, I felt this desire. I concluded that post with the following veiled threat:
I can remember typing that sentence. There was no true reason for calling him Joshua, but I could feel something nagging at me to write it that way. It was in the pit of my stomach and it controlled my fingers. I needed to type that U and that A. After I had used the long version of his name in my first post I felt that I needed to keep a consistency about my use of his name. It had to become almost my calling card. It feels like it disconnects the blog Joshua from the real world Josh. I would like to set the record straight. In real life, I do not call my brother Joshua.And, Joshua, you hijacked my Courier font. I want it back.
4 comments:
Here's what I found interesting: "It feels like it disconnects the blog Joshua from the real world Josh."
By referring to him as "Joshua" instead of Josh, he becomes a "character" of the blog. The very idea that a blog could have characters, like the cast of a movie, and that these characters would in some way be variably different then the writers behind them is striking. It's like having a stage persona, except for a blog.
Fasten... zip... if I remember.
Wow! In two paragraphs Brock eloquently made exactly the point that I believe I was trying to impress. Well done!
I was inspired by your very point good sir.
Post a Comment